x_maker: (Making modifications)
[personal profile] x_maker
...how the perceptions of responsibility go around here. After a night's thought on the subject, I came to this conclusion. While the appropriate teachers and staff are bound by ethical considerations and vocation to look out for our best interests, it stands to some argument as to who should decide what those best interests are. In Amanda's case, it was the choice to risk her own health for something she obviously thought was worth it. Argue the priorities all you want, it was still her decision to make, proven by the simple fact that she did it.

Conversely, I get asked to rush to the medlab to assist with a technical matter, and spend the better part of eight hours running simulations on the computer software and burying myself in schematics and test data. When I've got two roommates upstairs who nearly ripped each other to shreds a few days ago, and could possibly be doing the same right now, I don't know. Now, much like Amanda - I like using my power to help people. So far, it doesn't give me any nosebleeds or migraines or what have you. I think my record has been staying up working for fifty-three hours, but that's another matter entirely.

The point is, it's my choice to do so. I don't consider myself obligated in any way to use what I can do to be of service - I do it because I choose to. If there was the possibility of harm, that would affect my decision - but it would still be my decision. To try and dictate when and where it shouldn't be used, I see that as no different than slapping someone in chains - because you take away that aspect of choice.

It's no secret - I don't like the inhibitors. I detest "the Box". I hate the concept of image inducers. But I know that in the first two cases, they are sometimes medically necessary. In the latter, it's simply a matter of fear and vanity, and a choice that's up to the individual to use. But imagine telling someone "If you're going to go out in public, you MUST use the image inducer". What does that tell them other than "You're not fit for going out as you are. You are not good enough."?

Despite everyone's favorite buzzword of "equality" - the simple fact remains that we are not equal with those generations that came before us. Our powers do define us, like it or not. The same way that a basketball player being tall defines who he is. To try and take away our choice as to their appropriate use is no different than putting mutants' names on a registration list, or mandating separate lunch counters and drinking fountains.

I am a mutant, and I will not be ashamed of it. In the outside world OR here. That gives me an edge, an advantage, a natural gift that makes me unique. And because it is mine, the choice of how to use it is mine - and I will deal with the consequences or merits that result. While I appreciate the ability I have here to refine it and train it more than I can express - in the end, I will not surrender my freedom as to how I use it. But I suppose that's a choice everyone has to make for themselves.

If anyone wants to think more on this, I have some great books to read on the subject.

Date: 2005-02-20 07:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
You are cordially invited to my philosophy class, John Henry. I find your rhetoric as stated uninformed and immature. You are welcome to change my mind.

Date: 2005-02-20 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
You can find it what you want. Some folks' minds can't be changed, that much I'm aware of. Thank you for the offer, though.

Date: 2005-02-20 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
You're correct, Forge. Some people never learn. Those people I pity and I fear. I hope that you don't choose to remain in an unexamined position on this.

For the record, on this issue, my mind has changed once.

The offer is a standing one.

Date: 2005-02-21 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
After some discussion with people (read: getting my head thwacked), I believe I may take you up on that talk. Not sure I could take a whole class on it, but I do owe you a bit of an apology.

Date: 2005-02-21 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
Head thwacked? Do I want to know?

Oh, come to a whole phil class. You might even like it. We're very logical.

No apology necessary to me. I'll take thoughtful discussion instead.

Date: 2005-02-21 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
Why's everyone keep assuming I'm all about the logic? :) I'm an engineering superfreak, not some Mister Spock robot. Not everything has to be all superlogical equations and crap.

But if I have a free period, I may see about auditing a class, if that's okay.

Date: 2005-02-21 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
Ah, of course, nothing logical about engineering.

Just thought the non-emotive approach would appeal is all.

Like I said, the offer is standing. Feel free to drop in.

Date: 2005-02-21 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
Engineering is logical, because it's supposed to be. I *am* open-minded enough to realize that not everything has to be bound by rigid inflexible logic, you know. I have to take English Lit AND Humanities, after all...

Date: 2005-02-21 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
Certain things we do have to have a sort of order and logic to them - engineering, hard sciences, mathematics, cooking. Then there's the stuff that seems to defy logic, the creative arts, humanities, history, all that stuff. I always figured philosophy would fall into the latter category, being based on opinion and argument.

Which is not to say that I'm opposed to it. I have been known from time to time to be rather vocal about my opinions. And learning how to effectively back them up would be advantageous.

Date: 2005-02-21 02:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
Oh, I follow now. Sorry, ran out of coffee and the new pot hasn't finished.

I would very loosely define philosophy as the application of logic to the question why. While it is a humanities course, it is not opinion based. Argument, on the other hand, we do use.

Date: 2005-02-21 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
Also? Cooking is as much an art as a science. *food snob*

Date: 2005-02-21 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
In as much as engineering is the science / invention is the art; baking/boiling/stewing is the science, cooking is the art. Right?

Date: 2005-02-21 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
I'd say the baking/boiling/stewing is the media. The meal is the art.

I'm making dinner right now so you could come on down and see for yourself. *is not at all attempting to dragoon an assistant, really*

Date: 2005-02-21 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-forge.livejournal.com
If I were not offsite right now, I'd...

I am attempting to fight for control of the PDA and am being told to put it away and eat. Finicky cat.

Date: 2005-02-21 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] x-polarisstar.livejournal.com
Tell Catseye I said hello.

You can come experience the process tomorrow. Say about 4?

Profile

x_maker: (Default)
John Henry Forge

April 2013

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 2930    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 03:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios