I find it rather telling...
Feb. 20th, 2005 12:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...how the perceptions of responsibility go around here. After a night's thought on the subject, I came to this conclusion. While the appropriate teachers and staff are bound by ethical considerations and vocation to look out for our best interests, it stands to some argument as to who should decide what those best interests are. In Amanda's case, it was the choice to risk her own health for something she obviously thought was worth it. Argue the priorities all you want, it was still her decision to make, proven by the simple fact that she did it.
Conversely, I get asked to rush to the medlab to assist with a technical matter, and spend the better part of eight hours running simulations on the computer software and burying myself in schematics and test data. When I've got two roommates upstairs who nearly ripped each other to shreds a few days ago, and could possibly be doing the same right now, I don't know. Now, much like Amanda - I like using my power to help people. So far, it doesn't give me any nosebleeds or migraines or what have you. I think my record has been staying up working for fifty-three hours, but that's another matter entirely.
The point is, it's my choice to do so. I don't consider myself obligated in any way to use what I can do to be of service - I do it because I choose to. If there was the possibility of harm, that would affect my decision - but it would still be my decision. To try and dictate when and where it shouldn't be used, I see that as no different than slapping someone in chains - because you take away that aspect of choice.
It's no secret - I don't like the inhibitors. I detest "the Box". I hate the concept of image inducers. But I know that in the first two cases, they are sometimes medically necessary. In the latter, it's simply a matter of fear and vanity, and a choice that's up to the individual to use. But imagine telling someone "If you're going to go out in public, you MUST use the image inducer". What does that tell them other than "You're not fit for going out as you are. You are not good enough."?
Despite everyone's favorite buzzword of "equality" - the simple fact remains that we are not equal with those generations that came before us. Our powers do define us, like it or not. The same way that a basketball player being tall defines who he is. To try and take away our choice as to their appropriate use is no different than putting mutants' names on a registration list, or mandating separate lunch counters and drinking fountains.
I am a mutant, and I will not be ashamed of it. In the outside world OR here. That gives me an edge, an advantage, a natural gift that makes me unique. And because it is mine, the choice of how to use it is mine - and I will deal with the consequences or merits that result. While I appreciate the ability I have here to refine it and train it more than I can express - in the end, I will not surrender my freedom as to how I use it. But I suppose that's a choice everyone has to make for themselves.
If anyone wants to think more on this, I have some great books to read on the subject.
Conversely, I get asked to rush to the medlab to assist with a technical matter, and spend the better part of eight hours running simulations on the computer software and burying myself in schematics and test data. When I've got two roommates upstairs who nearly ripped each other to shreds a few days ago, and could possibly be doing the same right now, I don't know. Now, much like Amanda - I like using my power to help people. So far, it doesn't give me any nosebleeds or migraines or what have you. I think my record has been staying up working for fifty-three hours, but that's another matter entirely.
The point is, it's my choice to do so. I don't consider myself obligated in any way to use what I can do to be of service - I do it because I choose to. If there was the possibility of harm, that would affect my decision - but it would still be my decision. To try and dictate when and where it shouldn't be used, I see that as no different than slapping someone in chains - because you take away that aspect of choice.
It's no secret - I don't like the inhibitors. I detest "the Box". I hate the concept of image inducers. But I know that in the first two cases, they are sometimes medically necessary. In the latter, it's simply a matter of fear and vanity, and a choice that's up to the individual to use. But imagine telling someone "If you're going to go out in public, you MUST use the image inducer". What does that tell them other than "You're not fit for going out as you are. You are not good enough."?
Despite everyone's favorite buzzword of "equality" - the simple fact remains that we are not equal with those generations that came before us. Our powers do define us, like it or not. The same way that a basketball player being tall defines who he is. To try and take away our choice as to their appropriate use is no different than putting mutants' names on a registration list, or mandating separate lunch counters and drinking fountains.
I am a mutant, and I will not be ashamed of it. In the outside world OR here. That gives me an edge, an advantage, a natural gift that makes me unique. And because it is mine, the choice of how to use it is mine - and I will deal with the consequences or merits that result. While I appreciate the ability I have here to refine it and train it more than I can express - in the end, I will not surrender my freedom as to how I use it. But I suppose that's a choice everyone has to make for themselves.
If anyone wants to think more on this, I have some great books to read on the subject.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 11:42 pm (UTC)For the record, on this issue, my mind has changed once.
The offer is a standing one.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 11:54 am (UTC)Oh, come to a whole phil class. You might even like it. We're very logical.
No apology necessary to me. I'll take thoughtful discussion instead.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 01:55 pm (UTC)But if I have a free period, I may see about auditing a class, if that's okay.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:08 pm (UTC)Just thought the non-emotive approach would appeal is all.
Like I said, the offer is standing. Feel free to drop in.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:22 pm (UTC)Which is not to say that I'm opposed to it. I have been known from time to time to be rather vocal about my opinions. And learning how to effectively back them up would be advantageous.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:30 pm (UTC)I would very loosely define philosophy as the application of logic to the question why. While it is a humanities course, it is not opinion based. Argument, on the other hand, we do use.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:48 pm (UTC)I'm making dinner right now so you could come on down and see for yourself. *is not at all attempting to dragoon an assistant, really*
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:49 pm (UTC)I am attempting to fight for control of the PDA and am being told to put it away and eat. Finicky cat.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-21 02:52 pm (UTC)You can come experience the process tomorrow. Say about 4?