Mostly joking...
But seriously, how hard WOULD it be to take over a small state or even a small country and claim it as a mutant homeland? Or even do it diplomatically, just assign a "homeland". I mean, they did it with Israel back half a century ago, what's to say that couldn't be done for a mutant homeland?
Not that I'd advocate it - I mean, look how horribly it's gone over in the Middle East - but really, who thinks it couldn't be a feasible occurrence in the next, oh, twenty years?
Not that I'd advocate it - I mean, look how horribly it's gone over in the Middle East - but really, who thinks it couldn't be a feasible occurrence in the next, oh, twenty years?
no subject
no subject
Or, it'd just be a bad idea in general, because if a mutant took over a country, then the whole wide world would be all OMGWTFBBQ!!!!11!!!eleventy-!1!!!!111 and we'd all be put into "protective" custody.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But not all created states designed for a certain group have had histories of conflict and bloodshed to establish them. Liberia, for example.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
In summary: I think humans and mutants living in a mixed society is a better idea. Sticking a bunch of people somewhere where they can all exclude the rest of the world because they're different leads to feelings of resentment. It's like the stupid high school cliques, but with nukes.
One phrase for you.
Manuel
no subject
I ain't going back to one.
no subject
Your opinion is acceptable. Actually I think I quite agree.
no subject
no subject
Kidding (well, I mostly wasn't, but I'll pretend) aside, there are an inordinate number of really, really smart people here. As well as a fair number of morons, so it probably balances out.
no subject
STAND UP AND BE COUNTED, THOSE OF AVERAGE INTELLECT!